SAGES Magazine

THE SOUTH AFRICAN GASTROENTEROLOGY REVIEW 2022 | VOLUME 20 | ISSUE 1 | 39 al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (23): 2191- 2200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031618 26. Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, Raptopoulos V, Fareell RJ, Morrin MM. Ct colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2007; 244 (2): 471-478 27. Neri E, Faggioni L, Cerri F, Turini F, Angeli S, Cini L, Perrone F, Paolicchi F, Bartolozzi C. CT ccolonography versus double-contrast barium enema for screening of colorectal cancer: comparison of radiation burden. Abdominal Imaging 2010; 35:596-601 28. Scalise P, Mantarro A, Pancrazi F, Neri E. Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: a review of current recommendations in methodology and clinical indications. World J Radiol 2016; 28 (5): 472-483. 29. Chung DJ, Huh KC, Choi WJ, Kim JK. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. AJR. 2005;184 (1):98-103. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840098 30. Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, Krali-Hans I, von Wagner C, Edwards R et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer of large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. The Lancet. 2013; 381:1185-93 31. British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (BSGAR) and The Royal College of Radiologists. Guidance on the use of CT colonography for suspected cancer ( Ref NO: BF CR [14]9), September 2014. 32. Guidelines for good practice in health care professions. Seeking patients’ informed consent: the ethical considerations. Health Professions Council of South Africa Booklet 4, 2016. 33. American College of Radiology: Appropriateness criteria. [Cited 2022 January 12]. Available from: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria 34. Image Gently. [Cited 2022 January 12]. Available from: https://www. imagegently.org/ 35. Image Wisely. [Cited 2022 January 12]. Available from: https://www. imagewisely.org/ 36. Eurosafe Imaging. [Cited 2022 January 12]. Available from: https://www. myesr.org/quality-safety/eurosafe-imaging 37. AfroSafe. Championing radiation safety in Africa. [Cited 2022 January 12]. Available from: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_ Public/47/035/47035637.pdf 38. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Bonn call for action. [Cited 2022 January 12].Available from: https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/ resources/bonn-call-for-action-platform 39. Delichas MG, Hatziioannou K, Papanastassiou E, Albanopoulou I, Chatzi E, Sioundas A, Psarrakos K. Radiation doses to patients undergoing barium meal and barium enema examinations. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004; 109 (3):243-247. 40. Hirofuyi Y, Aoyama T, Koyama S, Kawaura C, Fiyii K. Evaluation of patient dose for barium enema and CT colonography in Japan. The British J of Radiology 2009; 82:219-227. 41. Parrvulescu F, Yeong C, Chandapani R. Radiation dose comparison: CT colonography with hybrid iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection versus barium enema. Poster presented at: Mersey School Of Radiology Research Day 2014. [Cited 2022 January 12]. Available from: https://cdn.technologynetworks.com/ep/pdfs/radiation-dose-comparison- ct-colonoscopy-with-hybrid-iterative-reconstruction-versus-filtered-back. pdf 42. Lubner MG, Pooler BD, Kitchin DR, Tang J, Li K, Kim DH, Munoz del Rio A, Chen GH, Pickhardt PJ. Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging . Eur Radiol 2015; 25(7):2089-102. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3603-9. Epub 2015 Apr 23. 43. Kang HJ, Kim SE, Shin CI, Joo I, Ryu H, Kim SG, Im JP, Han JK. Sub-millisievert CT colonography: effect of knowledge-based iterative reconstruction on the detection of colonic polyps. Eur Radiol 2018; 28 (12): 5258-5266. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5545-5. 44. Popic J, Tipuric S, Balen I, Mrzljak A. Computed tomography colonography: how low can we go? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar 16;13(3):72-81. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i3.72. PMID: 33763187 45. Computed tomography (CT) colonography, IAEA. [Cited 2022 January 12]. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health- professionals/radiology/computed-tomography/computed-tomography- colonography#3 46. Nabasenya C, Davidson F, Kotze T, Engel-Hills P. Dose reference levels for barium enema at state hospitals in the Western Cape SouthAfrica. The SARadiographer 2014; 52 (2); 21-25 47. Macari M, Bini EJ. CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? Radiology. 2005; 237: 819-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ radiol.22373041717 48. Pickhardt PJ. Screening CT colonography: how I do it. AJR 2007; 184 (2):290-298 49. de Haan MC, Halligan S, Stoker J. Does CT colonography have a role for population-based colorectal screening? Eur Rad. 2012. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00330-012-2449-7 50. Bortz JH . An approach for performing a successful CT colonography examination. SAfr J Rad 2014; 18(1):Art#607, 11 pages. http://dx.doi/ org/10.4102/sajr.v18i1.607. 51. Pickhardt PJ, Yee J, Johnson CD. CT colonography: over two decades from discovery to practice. Abdom Radiol 2018; 43:517-522. 52. Bortz JH. CT colonography in the visualisation of lymphangioma: a rare benign submucosal lesion. SAR 2021; 59 (1): 33-40. 53. Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonoscopy. AJR 2007; 198:774-779. 54. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, Maccarty RL, Welch TJ, Vanness DJ, Ahlquist DA. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in screening population. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124 (4): 911-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/gast.2003.50158 55. Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Vanness DJ, Lo JY, Kim DH, Taylor AJ, Winter TC, Hinshaw JL. Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact. Radiology 2008; 49 (1): 151 -159 56. Yee Y, Weinstein S, Morgan T, Alore P, Aslam R. Advances in CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. J Cancer 2013; 4 (3): 200-209. 57. Pooler BD, Kim DH,Pickhardt PJ. Potentially important extracolonic findings at CT colonography: incidence and outcomes of data from a clinical screening program. AJR 2016; 206: 313-318 58. Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: prevalence, benefits, challenges, and opportunities. AJR 2017; 209:94-102 59. Pullens HJ, van Leeuwen MS, Laheij RJ, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD. CT- colonography after incomplete colonoscopy: what is the diagnostic yield? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:593-599. 60. Laghi A. Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indicatiions. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (45):16858- 16867 61. Maggialetti N, Capasso R, Pinto D, Carbone M, LaportaA, Schipani S, Piccolo CL, Zappia M, Reginelli A, D’Innocenzo M, Brunese L. Diagnostic value of computed tomography colonography (CTC) after incomplete optical colonoscopy. International J Surgery 2016; 33: 536-544 62. De Lázaro y de Molina S, Marco-Doménech SF, Casanovas-Feliu E, Gaona-Morales J. Usefulness of colonography by tomography or virtual colonoscopy. Anales de Radiología México. 2016;15(3):177-193 63. Villa NA, Pannala R, Pasha SF, Leighton JA. Alternatives to incomplete colonoscopy. Curr Gastrornterol Rep 2015; 17:43 Doi 10.1007/s11894- 015-0468-7 64. Rex DK, Adler SN, Aisenberg J, Burch WC, Carretero C, Chowers Y et al. Accuracy of capsule colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2015; 148 ( 5); 948-957. 65. Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navos M, Neuhaus H, Deviere J, Fockens P et al. Second generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endoscopy 2011; 74: 581-589 66. Spada C, Hassan C, Bellini D, Burling D, Cappello G, Carretero C et al. Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal andAbdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline – update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52:1127-1141. Doi 10.1055/a- 1258-4819 67. van Wagner, Smith S, Halligan S, Ghanouni A, Power E, Lilford RJ et al. Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Eur Rad. 2011; 21:2046-2055. CASE SERIES